A news allegation reported by Patrick Webb claims that former top health official Anthony Fauci worked with elements of the U.S. Intelligence Community to conceal his role in funding “dangerous” gain-of-function (GoF) research, using taxpayer money, and that Fauci then lied to Congress under oath.
According to the claim attributed to DNI Tulsi Gabbard, the controversy centers on whether Fauci’s actions—particularly involving GoF research—were improperly hidden from oversight bodies and whether the funding arrangements and related communications were managed in ways that reduced transparency. The allegation further asserts that Fauci did not merely make incomplete disclosures, but that he allegedly misrepresented material facts while testifying, thereby breaching the sworn duty owed to congressional investigators.
The story positions the dispute within a broader accountability framework: it argues that if GoF research was funded with public funds, then congressional oversight should have included clear, accurate reporting about who authorized the research, how it was financed, and what the associated risks were. In the alleged version of events, those expectations were not met, and the concealment is described as involving coordination beyond ordinary public-health channels—specifically with the Intelligence Community.
The central charge, as presented in the report, is that Fauci “conspired” with intelligence-related actors to keep the financial support for GoF research out of public view and out of the hands of lawmakers who could demand documents, call witnesses, and set policy guardrails. While the claim is framed in strongly accusatory language, its purpose in the news narrative is to underline alleged failures of transparency, particularly during the period when Congress was actively seeking answers regarding the origins and governance of high-risk biomedical research.
Another core element of the allegation focuses on testimony. The story says Fauci lied to Congress while under oath. This means the claim is not only about alleged behind-the-scenes funding decisions, but also about the accuracy of statements provided in formal settings where false or misleading testimony could carry significant legal consequences. The article’s framing suggests that congressional inquiries relied on sworn accounts that—according to this allegation—did not reflect the full reality of the funding trail and any coordination that allegedly occurred.
The news narrative also implies a pattern of accountability failure: it suggests that oversight efforts may have been undermined by withheld information, which could include documentation, communications, or details about how public funds were used. By emphasizing both the Intelligence Community connection and the congressional oath-taking component, the story aims to portray the matter as one involving both secrecy and potential obstruction of legislative scrutiny.
In addition, the story highlights the role of Tulsi Gabbard, described here as the DNI. The attribution to her is used to lend specificity to the claims, presenting them as part of a larger set of accusations about what intelligence and public-health leadership may have done to manage sensitive research programs. The news hook is therefore twofold: (1) concealment of taxpayer funding for dangerous GoF research, and (2) alleged misinformation delivered to Congress.
The article, as summarized in the prompt, presents the allegation as “BREAKING,” indicating urgency and emphasizing that the claims are newly surfaced or newly asserted. The overall message is that, if proven, the conduct alleged would represent a serious breach of public trust, especially because taxpayer dollars are at stake and because Congress’s oversight function depends on truthful testimony.
Finally, the story functions as a claim-forward political narrative rather than a report of adjudicated facts. It focuses on what is alleged by the named figure and reproduced by Patrick Webb, and it calls attention to the accountability questions that arise when high-risk biomedical research is funded publicly and discussed in sworn congressional settings.
Source: Source
Patrick Webb: BREAKING: Anthony Fauci conspired with the Intelligence Community to conceal his funding of dangerous gain-of-function research using taxpayer dollars and lied to Congress about it while under oath, per DNI Tulsi Gabbard.. #breaking
— @Patrickwebb May 1, 2026