A fresh controversy has erupted around the National Testing Agency (NTA) and the selection of Abu Dhabi as an exam centre, with questions raised over how the option was exercised and whether it was chosen appropriately. The dispute gained attention after NDTV reported a statement in the context of allegations linked to the “Centre row” surrounding the exam process and centre allocation.
According to the reported development, the NTA has clarified its position by pointing to a specific claim involving the student’s login credentials. NDTV’s breaking update frames the core of the issue around the assertion that Abu Dhabi was selected using the login of the student himself. In other words, the controversy centres on whether the choice of Abu Dhabi as a test location could have been made by someone else, or whether it was legitimately done through the official process under the student’s account.
The NDTV report highlights that NTA’s explanation is tied to the mechanics of how students access and manage their examination preferences. In typical exam workflows, candidates enter personal credentials into a portal to register, confirm details, and potentially make choices related to examination logistics. The matter under discussion is whether the portal’s actions—specifically the selection of a particular city as an exam centre—can be traced back to the student’s own authenticated login.
The controversy has grown because the matter is not being treated as merely technical; rather, it has become part of a wider public dispute about fairness and transparency in centre allotment. In many such cases, students and their families may worry that centre selections could be influenced improperly, whether through administrative errors, misunderstandings, or even potential misuse of access. That concern is particularly sensitive when the selected location is outside India, such as Abu Dhabi, which can have significant practical and financial implications for students.
NTA’s reported stance indicates that the agency is defending the integrity of the selection process. By emphasizing that the choice was made through the student’s login, NTA attempts to shift the debate from whether the centre option was fraudulently altered to whether the system records show an authenticated action from the candidate’s account. If the student’s credentials were indeed used, the agency’s position implies that the selection came directly from the candidate’s own interaction with the portal.
The NDTV update also suggests that this clarification is meant to address the allegations that have surfaced in the wake of the exam centre controversy. Such allegations often emerge when students realize their assigned or chosen centres do not align with what they recall selecting, or when they claim they never opted for a particular location. In those situations, NTA generally faces scrutiny over how user actions are recorded and how the portal logs indicate who made changes.
As the controversy spreads, the key question remains the same: whether Abu Dhabi was chosen through legitimate steps tied to the candidate’s own access, or whether there was a breach, error, or unintended selection. NTA’s response, as described in the report, provides a direct explanation that the selection was linked to the student’s login activity.
While the details of the technical evidence—such as timestamps, audit logs, or the specific portal actions—are not fully outlined in the brief breaking report itself, the core message is clear: NTA maintains that the selection of Abu Dhabi as an exam centre can be traced to the student’s own account usage. This is intended to counter claims that the process may have been manipulated or misrepresented.
The reporting also underlines that the issue has been discussed under the broader banner of the “Centre row,” implying that there are multiple layers to the dispute, including administrative explanations, student grievances, and public questions about procedural safeguards. The NTA’s statement functions as one of the central pieces of the agency’s defence, particularly by linking the centre selection to authenticated student login.
For students affected by the controversy, the immediate concern is whether they will face inconvenience or penalties linked to the chosen centre. In exam-related arrangements, changes to venue or reassignment can be difficult, time-consuming, or subject to strict timelines. Therefore, explanations that attribute centre selection to a student’s logged-in actions may be seen as decisive in determining accountability and next steps.
Overall, NDTV’s breaking report captures NTA’s clarification in response to the ongoing controversy over exam centre selection. The agency’s position—highlighting that Abu Dhabi was selected through the student’s own login—aims to establish that the process followed the proper authenticated pathway. According to NDTV India.
NDTV India: 🔴 #BREAKING | ‘खुद छात्र के लॉगिन से अबू धाबी चुना गया’- सेंटर विवाद पर NTA का बयान. #breaking
— @ndtvindia May 1, 2026