Patrick Webb Says ODNI Declassified Files Under Tulsi Gabbard Show Fauci Funded Wuhan Gain-of-Function With Taxpayer Money

By | June 19, 2026

A new claim has circulated in a breaking-style report associated with Patrick Webb, alleging that newly declassified documents were released by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) under the political influence of Tulsi Gabbard. The core of the allegation is that Anthony Fauci, a prominent figure associated with the U.S. government’s pandemic response, used millions of taxpayer dollars to support dangerous gain-of-function research.

According to the story, the alleged evidence comes from documents that have been newly declassified, and that these files purportedly connect U.S. funding to research activities carried out at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China. The report’s framing emphasizes that the research is described as “gain-of-function,” a term commonly used to refer to studies that may alter pathogens or their properties in ways that could increase transmissibility, virulence, or other capabilities. The claim is presented as urgent and consequential, suggesting that previously hidden or unclear information has now been made public through ODNI declassification.

The report specifically asserts that the declassified materials show Fauci’s role in directing or enabling funding streams tied to this line of research. It also characterizes the money as “millions of taxpayer dollars,” indicating the allegation is not only about scientific collaboration but also about public spending and accountability. The implication is that U.S. government support for the Wuhan work may have involved risks that were not adequately communicated or handled according to the story’s perspective.

In addition to the alleged funding link, the story highlights the ODNI’s role as the government body associated with intelligence oversight and declassification. By referencing declassified documents, the report suggests that intelligence agencies have produced or gathered information significant enough to warrant public release. The timing and the mention of a political figure—Tulsi Gabbard—in the context of these declassification activities are used to give the claim added credibility and to present the development as a direct result of political action.

The news story, as conveyed here, does not provide detailed methodology, document excerpts, or a point-by-point breakdown of what the ODNI documents purportedly say. Instead, it relies on a summary assertion: that the newly declassified materials connect Fauci and U.S. taxpayer funding to gain-of-function experiments at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The narrative is structured to encourage readers to treat the claim as newly revealed and potentially pivotal to understanding the origins and risk governance surrounding the Wuhan research program.

The report’s language suggests that the released documents could reshape public debate about how pandemic-related research was funded, regulated, and supervised. It also implies broader questions about whether adequate safeguards were in place and whether decision-makers communicated the nature of the risks involved. By focusing on “dangerous” gain-of-function work, the story aims to highlight not only financial involvement but also the ethical and safety concerns associated with such research.

Finally, the report’s framing—“BREAKING” and “newly declassified”—signals that the author intends this to function as a major revelation, not a routine update. The claim is positioned as timely, meant to draw attention and potentially prompt further investigation by journalists, watchdog groups, or government officials.

Overall, the story centers on a single major allegation: that ODNI declassified documents, released in connection with Tulsi Gabbard, show Anthony Fauci used millions of taxpayer dollars to fund risky gain-of-function research conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. As presented in the report, these documents are used to argue that previously unknown or insufficiently understood funding relationships now have an evidentiary basis through declassification.

Source: Source

News Source

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *